![define omnipresence define omnipresence](https://daedeluskite.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1470939110-feynmansdoub.png)
![define omnipresence define omnipresence](https://www.poemhunter.com/i/poem_images/567/insomnia-182.jpg)
Anslem, in his Ontological Argument, describes God as the “Greatest Conceivable Being,” the being beyond which we cannot conceive of anything greater. Believing in more than one infinite trait would thus be irrational this isn’t to say that people shouldn’t hold such beliefs, but being irrational is a very strong reason to be said against keeping them. I will argue that for the sake of consistency, one can only maintain a single infinite trait that is traditionally ascribed to God, for if others are introduced, the result is a contradiction between the traits themselves or serious difficulties for what we understand to be the reality of the universe. The goal of many religious philosophers has been to describe a system that understands the traits of God as both internally consistent and consistent with what we understand about ourselves and the world. It is when infinite traits are ascribed to a deity that we run into problems maintaining a rationally consistent understanding of the God and the universe. It is entirely rational to believe that a limited God exists, that is, one that can only do things that are rationally possible and is capable of being understood, as there is nothing about this God’s traits that are inherently irrational. God can take many forms and have many traits. 17 What Type of God is it Rational to Believe in?Noah Levin27ġ7 What Type of God is it Rational to Believe in?.